Tweet
Re: EOS 5D > Nikon D200
Sugar,
Ik ben wel akkoord, als je "goede prime" definieert. Ik vermoed dat de meesten denken dat de resolutie van de sensor doorslaggevend is, en niet beseffen wat het kost aan glas om die er dan ook uit te halen.
Er is een artikel verschenen mbt. Zeiss lenzen en Nikon. Dat zou een goede combinatie zijn. Dus Nikon glas haalt niet de max uit de sensor...
Hierna 2 citaten uit Luminous Landscape artikels:
Working with most of the high-end DSLRs to become available over the past 5 years has convinced me of one thing – the best sensors are limited in their resolving power by a combination of lens quality and user technique. Only when the best prime lenses are used in combination with the most rigorous shooting technique (heavy tripod / high shutter speed, optimum aperture, mirror lock up / remote release, precision focusing) can a sensor like that in the Canon 1Ds MKII really be challenged. When shooting with a typical zoom lens, hand-held, and with casual technique, the resolving capabilities of the sensor usually are not being seriously tested.
en nog:
Digital Lenses: I don't mean lenses for 1.6X factor bodies. I mean real digital lenses – ones designed to match the resolution capability of 16MP or bigger sensors. Right now there are precious few lenses in Canon's otherwise impressive line up that are equal to the demands of the 1Ds MKII, let alone what newer bodies may offer. It seems that there's little point to making higher resolution imaging chips if the weakest links in the chain are the glass, especially when it comes to wide angle lenses. The Schneider Digitar lenses for medium format digital are a good example of what can be achieved.
Dpaul
Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door sugar
Sugar,
Ik ben wel akkoord, als je "goede prime" definieert. Ik vermoed dat de meesten denken dat de resolutie van de sensor doorslaggevend is, en niet beseffen wat het kost aan glas om die er dan ook uit te halen.
Er is een artikel verschenen mbt. Zeiss lenzen en Nikon. Dat zou een goede combinatie zijn. Dus Nikon glas haalt niet de max uit de sensor...
Hierna 2 citaten uit Luminous Landscape artikels:
Working with most of the high-end DSLRs to become available over the past 5 years has convinced me of one thing – the best sensors are limited in their resolving power by a combination of lens quality and user technique. Only when the best prime lenses are used in combination with the most rigorous shooting technique (heavy tripod / high shutter speed, optimum aperture, mirror lock up / remote release, precision focusing) can a sensor like that in the Canon 1Ds MKII really be challenged. When shooting with a typical zoom lens, hand-held, and with casual technique, the resolving capabilities of the sensor usually are not being seriously tested.
en nog:
Digital Lenses: I don't mean lenses for 1.6X factor bodies. I mean real digital lenses – ones designed to match the resolution capability of 16MP or bigger sensors. Right now there are precious few lenses in Canon's otherwise impressive line up that are equal to the demands of the 1Ds MKII, let alone what newer bodies may offer. It seems that there's little point to making higher resolution imaging chips if the weakest links in the chain are the glass, especially when it comes to wide angle lenses. The Schneider Digitar lenses for medium format digital are a good example of what can be achieved.
Dpaul
Comment