Eén is top. De overgang van de overbelichte delen en het out of focus gedeelte leiden me naar het interessante gedeelte van het model : het bovenlichaam en gezicht. Dat gedeelte is in balans, haarscherp, mooi belicht en de toning komt hier perfect tot zijn recht. Mooi portret en intiem portret.
Nummer twee vind ik het gedeelte overbelicht vs gedeemte in balans te storend. Samen met het out of focus gedeelte werkt het hier contraproductief en trekt de aandacht weg van het gezicht. Het been wordt hierdoor te dominant en je glijdt automatisch af tot de misvormde handen en voet. Jammer.
Mijn twee centjes ...
Omdat je het zo wou : wat vindt jij de "value in use" in dit effect bij nummer 2 ?
Slu !
Tjerri
Last edited by Tjerri; 29 november 2009, 10:49.
Reden: Grammatica aangepast ...
Uiteraard zeer mooie foto's en technisch perfect in orde. De foto's getuigen van een overmate degelijke professionele kwaliteit en dat blijkt verder ook uit hetgeen te zien is op de websites die vermeld staan onderaan. Op een dezer websites wordt publiciteit gemaakt voor te betalen fototshoots. Ondertussen blijven beginnende amateurs die hier foto's posten op hun honger zitten inzake (zinvolle) reacties ondanks dat het lidgeld voor iedereen hetzelfde is. Sorry, maar dit moest mij even van het hart, sans rancune overigens !
For everybody else it would be a disaster, but not for Trebs, oooo nooo
For me it's garbage.
No sorry.
Henri
goodness me... you asked me a question based on your own personal view.
I gave mine, based on my personal view and as the photographer. I don't have a right to defend something I create and post?
Who the hell do you think you are?
Christ on a bike, this place really does nee BD safe images, anything else is painful for people to accept.
Henri, I thought you were bigger than that. Sad to see you react this way.
As a note:
I do accept any comments made, whether I decide to react to them is up to me, as is the right of any member of this forum. I respect the right of people to cast their opinion and I expect people to respect my right to post and defend my work in the way I see fit. If my reactions seem arrogant to some. Fine. There are plenty more that appreciate my direct approach.
The reaction I just saw was out of order and has once again demonstrated to me that this place is not open at all to anything of artistic license. The rules here are simple.
Make is sharp, make it safe. Keep popular, keep kissing butt and you'll score well.
Sorry, the world is a little bigger, if you don't like it, say so, I don't mind. Just don't expect me to bend over and take it every time without a reaction in my defence.
goodness me... you asked me a question based on your own personal view.
I gave mine, based on my personal view and as the photographer. I don't have a right to defend something I create and post?
Who the hell do you think you are?
Christ on a bike, this place really does nee BD safe images, anything else is painful for people to accept.
Henri, I thought you were bigger than that. Sad to see you react this way.
Who am I? just a BD-visitor with an open straightforward mind. I respect all kind of experiences, good or wrong, but I give my opinion (my personal view) on the spot, even if it's negative for the TS. That's part of the reason I'm big (dixit).Just my way to see it.
Distortion, overexposure (burnouts), out of focus, for me it's not Trebs worthy. You can do better. So what's the reason behind this posting?
Would you accept such work from other pros?
No harm done.
Comment