Tweet
I just did some geeking myself with these 2 lenses. 
The Nikon AF-S 17-35 F2.8 and the AF-S 17-55 F2.8
Have a look at this mouse-over shot. Camera locked down and both shot at 17mm 2.8 in manual exposure....
link
Interestingly the 17mm on the 17-35 seems a little wider with less vignetting.
Maybe the illusion of 'wider' is deformation?
I've not been scientific enough to check all that, but I made 6 shots like this because I thought that image-shift was due to camera movement. Every time it's the same.
I'm not comparing IQ here, they're both stunning lenses. I've only bothered buying the 17-35 for it's D3 compatibility. It's just a rough and ready Sunday evening desktop test.
Real photos will follow soon
oh dear, I'm falling into that pixelpeeping trap.. arrrrghhhh
The Nikon AF-S 17-35 F2.8 and the AF-S 17-55 F2.8
Have a look at this mouse-over shot. Camera locked down and both shot at 17mm 2.8 in manual exposure....
link
Interestingly the 17mm on the 17-35 seems a little wider with less vignetting.
Maybe the illusion of 'wider' is deformation?
I've not been scientific enough to check all that, but I made 6 shots like this because I thought that image-shift was due to camera movement. Every time it's the same.
I'm not comparing IQ here, they're both stunning lenses. I've only bothered buying the 17-35 for it's D3 compatibility. It's just a rough and ready Sunday evening desktop test.
Real photos will follow soon
oh dear, I'm falling into that pixelpeeping trap.. arrrrghhhh
Misschien ligt het aan het feit dat het dichtbijopnamen zijn? Heb je beide objectieven al eens buiten getest met de focus op oneindig?
Comment